← Experiments

RecessionAlert monthly leading US index: no executable series

Insufficient evidence 1344 · 2026-08-29

Can the distinct RecessionAlert inventory row 'A new monthly leading US index' be independently replicated from the checked-in offline snapshot into a playable Other-indicators signal without inventing undisclosed rules or data?

No playable series. The SHA-verified March 3, 2016 article lists 23 monthly components, four recession-probability interpretations, a preferred average of the highest two probabilities, and Long-/Short-leading views, but provides no source-linked observations, complete transformations, release lag, or portfolio execution rule. Disposition is insufficient_evidence with public provenance and gap evidence only.

Research narrative

Plain-language result

This is a qualitative monthly leading-index and recession-probability article, not a ready-to-run indicator. It names 23 monthly components and a preferred average of the highest two probabilities, but does not provide the source series or a trading rule.

What can be reproduced

The page identity, full SHA256, article date, two crawl vintages, disclosed component list, probability-model description, and absence of target-page assets are verified from the read-only snapshot.

Why no chart or overlay is shown

The checked-in row has no machine-readable component, composite, or probability history, no complete threshold/state mapping, and no measurable release clock. Showing a reconstructed series or equity curve would imply data and rules the source never supplied.

Causal reading

The article date is the only disclosed cutoff. The archival interval is not publication lag; any future overlay must use point-in-time inputs and execute at least one available bar later. Unknown inputs remain unavailable.

Web exception

An interactive buy/sell control would be misleading while the source lacks observations, transformations, thresholds, and release timing. The supported public path is the static visual evidence table and offline notebook; reconsider only after separately authorized, source-linked redistributable data arrives.

Returns vs S&P

No signal overlay for this experiment (parameter sweep / search)

Aligned window, both rebased to 1.0 at start — No comparable equity curve was supplied; the chart is retained for consistent detail-page navigation. · S&P dashed, experiment solid. X = Date, Y = Equity (rebased to 1.0).

Signal driver & thresholds (x-aligned)

What the snapshot proves

evidencestatusdetail
Canonical page bodySHA-verified85,937 bytes; HTTP 200; fetched 2026-08-22; sha256:deedcf22d1d280248542375b8093cf84c98462b27f8eb4f92d09c0d5e1c8b246
Disclosed ruleNarrative only23 monthly component entries; four recession-probability interpretations; preferred average of the highest two probabilities; Long-/Short-leading views
Native spanSingle article snapshotArticle date 2016-03-03; in-body state through January 2016; no source-linked component or probability observations
Publication lagUnknown3,824-day article-to-crawl interval is archival snapshot delay, not economic-data release lag
Signal seriesUnavailableNo source-linked observations, numeric threshold/state mapping, or target-page asset rows
Causal overlayPolicy onlyPoint-in-time availability plus at least one available-bar lag; same-close/lookahead unsupported
DispositionInsufficient evidenceRegistry unchanged; no signal, equity curve, proxy, or source-claim metric fabricated

Narrative source content is reported without fabricating component data, model outputs, thresholds, signals, market metrics, portfolio actions, or raw media.

Stats

CAGR—Sharpe—
Sortino—maxDD—

Disposition

insufficient_evidence — publish the public-safe evidence and gap report; do not register an Other-indicators signal or invent a series.

Follow-on work

Errors & data gaps

No source-linked observations or native historical span for the 23 numbered components or claimed 21-component derived views. No exact component identifiers, units, transformations, membership, direction, or reconciliation of the 21-versus-23 discrepancy. No composite formula, component weights, score range, normalization, or missing-input handling. No definitions or source-linked outputs for the four recession-probability model interpretations. No exact highest-two averaging behavior for ties, missing models, or probability calibration. No numeric thresholds, signal states, persistence, confirmation, smoothing, or unavailable-state behavior. No recurring monthly release calendar, publication clock, timezone, synchronized cutoff, or point-in-time availability. No vintage, revision, backfill, or stale-data policy for components and derived models. No buy/sell/hold mapping, target instrument, investable universe, sizing, rebalance, holding period, costs, or slippage. No exit, re-entry, or execution timing rules. No source-linked recession/market outcome history or independent validation window for the article's warning claims. Referenced chart/report payloads are not present as target assets and raw bytes are not redistributed. No defensible related-page proxy, synthetic extension, or constituent rebuild preserving this distinct identity; public outputs exclude credentials, cookies, and private account data.

Follow-up

gh issue create --title "Follow-up RecessionAlert monthly leading US index no executable series" --body "Follow-up to 1344: Can the distinct RecessionAlert inventory row 'A new monthly leading US index' b" --label "priority:p2" --label "pipeline:research" --label "agent:ready"
# deep-link