Objective
Port + verify Faber Trinity Portfolio Lite vs AS metrics.
Notes: Trinity Lite replicated 2015+: corr 0.999 CAGRΔ +0.43%. Spec/backtest/trinity.py + runner. Findings: trinity-scale-batch.md.
Approach
Reuses existing report research/findings/trinity-scale-batch.md — tables/metrics preserved verbatim via source_report pointer. Body below summarizes grounded evidence from that report and adjacent artifacts.
Files / code / data changed
Associated commits (inferred from log grep t25):
5c7502f0research: Trinity Portfolio Lite replicated vs AllocateSmartly (t25) (#23)5c7502f0research: Trinity Portfolio Lite replicated vs AllocateSmartly (t25) (#23)- Source report:
research/findings/trinity-scale-batch.md - Task-history entry:
research/findings/task-history.json#t25
Results
Key table from source report (preserved):
| id | status | monthly corr | overlap CAGRΔ | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| trinity-lite | replicated | 0.999 | +0.43% | 50% permanent GMP + 50% top-5 tactical |
Conclusions and metrics are in research/findings/trinity-scale-batch.md; see detail page for preserved tables/metrics.
Conclusions
Trinity Lite replicated 2015+: corr 0.999 CAGRΔ +0.43%. Spec/backtest/trinity.py + runner. Findings: trinity-scale-batch.md.
Problems / follow-ups
- See source report or PR discussion for follow-ups. No unsupported follow-ups fabricated.
Links
- Task-history:
research/findings/task-history.jsonidt25 - Findings:
research/findings/trinity-scale-batch.md - Commits:
5c7502f0,5c7502f0