Review the next Allocate Smartly parity gap after catalog freshness

Objective

Review the next Allocate Smartly parity gap after catalog freshness.

Notes: Reviewed refreshed offering gaps; selected sortable maximum drawdown across individual and Meta catalogs as the next bounded parity unit.

Approach

Reuses existing report research/findings/parity-review-t220.md — tables/metrics preserved verbatim via source_report pointer. Body below summarizes grounded evidence from that report and adjacent artifacts.

Files / code / data changed

• No commit SHA confidently associated with t220 in sampled log [reconstructed — uncertain].
• Source report: research/findings/parity-review-t220.md
• Task-history entry: research/findings/task-history.json#t220

Results

Conclusions and metrics are in research/findings/parity-review-t220.md; see detail page for preserved tables/metrics.

Conclusions

[reconstructed — uncertain] Outcome inferred from status done and task note.

Problems / follow-ups

• See source report or PR discussion for follow-ups. No unsupported follow-ups fabricated.

Links

• Task-history: research/findings/task-history.json id t220
• Findings: research/findings/parity-review-t220.md