Research campaign · Iteration 1 · unassessed
PRO>SP500 Charts | RecessionAlert — exploratory Gen-1/Gen-2 proxy campaign
Can the pinned PRO>SP500 Charts snapshot yield any causally timed insight when DEM++, probability maps, ST-ALGO stop formulas, and on-row OHLC SHA256 are absent?
- Expressions
- 29
- Logged trials
- 29
- Independent events
- Not assessed
- Evidence
- unassessed
What the research found
29 labeled variants executed with lag>=1 causal_primary and lag-0/look-ahead control_only.
Best causal Sharpe: wb_gen2_short_dir_lag1 sharpe=1.709.
Native Gen-1/Gen-2/ST-ALGO/PCT fidelity remains NO-GO; Gen-2 probabilities remain non-actionable per source disclaimer.
Publication destination: Other/Research exploratory_tested_proxy (not Other/Indicators).
Mechanism and falsifiers
Not recorded in this iteration.
Not recorded in this iteration.
Confidence and limitations
market.sqlite ohlcv is close-only
DEM++ proprietary
On-row asset SHA256 absent
Gen-2 probabilities disclosed as non-actionable
WeeklyData MF/GEN-2 are off-row related workbooks
Not recorded in this iteration.
Compare expressions
Download evidenceExploratory results. Check each period, proxy and cost assumption before comparing. — means not recorded.
| Expression / family | CAGR | Sharpe | Max drawdown | Test period | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g1_trough_diff2_lag1gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy | 2.1% | 0.24 | -39.8% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g1_trough_diff1_lag1gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy | 3.7% | 0.36 | -39.7% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g1_trough_diff2_lag2gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy | 5.7% | 0.56 | -31.0% | 2005-06-30 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g1_top_diff2_lag1gen1-top-diffusion-top3-proxy | 10.8% | 0.80 | -50.8% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g1_top_diff2_lag2gen1-top-diffusion-top3-proxy | 10.0% | 0.76 | -50.8% | 2005-06-30 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g1_netavg_lag1gen1-net-avg-combo-timing | 9.0% | 0.94 | -28.8% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g1_netavg_lag2gen1-net-avg-combo-timing | 5.9% | 0.59 | -26.7% | 2005-06-30 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2_x6_lag1gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68 | 5.4% | 0.55 | -31.9% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2_x17_lag1gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68 | 7.9% | 0.79 | -34.3% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2_x34_lag1gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68 | 6.8% | 0.68 | -27.6% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2_x68_lag1gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68 | 10.0% | 0.96 | -24.2% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2_x6_lookahead_controlgen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68 | 8.8% | 0.78 | -29.8% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2sib_x7_lag1gen2-close-horizon-grid-7-17-34-72 | 4.8% | 0.49 | -39.6% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2sib_x72_lag1gen2-close-horizon-grid-7-17-34-72 | 10.1% | 0.98 | -22.2% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2sib_x7_lookahead_controlgen2-close-horizon-grid-7-17-34-72 | 9.0% | 0.82 | -29.4% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2avg_t08_lag1gen2-avg-bot-top-threshold-overlay | 5.3% | 0.66 | -22.2% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2avg_t09_lag1gen2-avg-bot-top-threshold-overlay | 3.9% | 0.59 | -25.0% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| g2avg_t06_lag2gen2-avg-bot-top-threshold-overlay | 8.9% | 0.74 | -31.1% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| st_lb7_lag4_latch1st-algo-causal-stop-proxy | 9.8% | 0.83 | -27.1% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| st_lb7_lag3_latch1st-algo-causal-stop-proxy | 10.5% | 0.88 | -30.4% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| st_lb17_lag5_latch0st-algo-causal-stop-proxy | 8.8% | 0.73 | -30.0% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| st_lb7_lag0_controlst-algo-causal-stop-proxy | 20.5% | 1.63 | -32.5% | 1993-02-28 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| be_spy_lb12_lag1_t0best-effort-neighbor-grid | 11.6% | 1.03 | -19.3% | 1994-01-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| be_spy_lb21_lag1_tneg05best-effort-neighbor-grid | 11.6% | 0.93 | -27.6% | 1994-10-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| be_spy_lb6_lag2_t0best-effort-neighbor-grid | 10.9% | 1.00 | -21.7% | 1993-08-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| wb_mf_diff_lag1related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay | 1.7% | 0.21 | -39.8% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| wb_gen2_short_dir_lag1related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay | 20.1% | 1.71 | -10.4% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| wb_gen2_short_ptop_lt08_lag1related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay | 10.3% | 0.75 | -50.8% | 2005-05-31 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
| wb_mf_diff_lag0_controlrelated-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay | -7.7% | -0.73 | -83.6% | 2005-04-30 2026-07-31 |
exploratory |
Open an expression to inspect its rules and request confirmation. The request must be submitted by a trusted repository collaborator.
g1_trough_diff2_lag1
- id
g1_trough_diff2_lag1
- family
gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g1_trough_diff1_lag1
- id
g1_trough_diff1_lag1
- family
gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g1_trough_diff2_lag2
- id
g1_trough_diff2_lag2
- family
gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy
- lag bars
2
- claim role
causal_primary
g1_top_diff2_lag1
- id
g1_top_diff2_lag1
- family
gen1-top-diffusion-top3-proxy
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g1_top_diff2_lag2
- id
g1_top_diff2_lag2
- family
gen1-top-diffusion-top3-proxy
- lag bars
2
- claim role
causal_primary
g1_netavg_lag1
- id
g1_netavg_lag1
- family
gen1-net-avg-combo-timing
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g1_netavg_lag2
- id
g1_netavg_lag2
- family
gen1-net-avg-combo-timing
- lag bars
2
- claim role
causal_primary
g2_x6_lag1
- id
g2_x6_lag1
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2_x17_lag1
- id
g2_x17_lag1
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2_x34_lag1
- id
g2_x34_lag1
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2_x68_lag1
- id
g2_x68_lag1
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2_x6_lookahead_control
- id
g2_x6_lookahead_control
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-6-17-34-68
- lag bars
0
- claim role
control_only
g2sib_x7_lag1
- id
g2sib_x7_lag1
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-7-17-34-72
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2sib_x72_lag1
- id
g2sib_x72_lag1
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-7-17-34-72
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2sib_x7_lookahead_control
- id
g2sib_x7_lookahead_control
- family
gen2-close-horizon-grid-7-17-34-72
- lag bars
0
- claim role
control_only
g2avg_t08_lag1
- id
g2avg_t08_lag1
- family
gen2-avg-bot-top-threshold-overlay
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2avg_t09_lag1
- id
g2avg_t09_lag1
- family
gen2-avg-bot-top-threshold-overlay
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
g2avg_t06_lag2
- id
g2avg_t06_lag2
- family
gen2-avg-bot-top-threshold-overlay
- lag bars
2
- claim role
causal_primary
st_lb7_lag4_latch1
- id
st_lb7_lag4_latch1
- family
st-algo-causal-stop-proxy
- lag bars
4
- claim role
causal_primary
st_lb7_lag3_latch1
- id
st_lb7_lag3_latch1
- family
st-algo-causal-stop-proxy
- lag bars
3
- claim role
causal_primary
st_lb17_lag5_latch0
- id
st_lb17_lag5_latch0
- family
st-algo-causal-stop-proxy
- lag bars
5
- claim role
causal_primary
st_lb7_lag0_control
- id
st_lb7_lag0_control
- family
st-algo-causal-stop-proxy
- lag bars
0
- claim role
control_only
be_spy_lb12_lag1_t0
- id
be_spy_lb12_lag1_t0
- family
best-effort-neighbor-grid
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
be_spy_lb21_lag1_tneg05
- id
be_spy_lb21_lag1_tneg05
- family
best-effort-neighbor-grid
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
be_spy_lb6_lag2_t0
- id
be_spy_lb6_lag2_t0
- family
best-effort-neighbor-grid
- lag bars
2
- claim role
causal_primary
wb_mf_diff_lag1
- id
wb_mf_diff_lag1
- family
related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
wb_gen2_short_dir_lag1
- id
wb_gen2_short_dir_lag1
- family
related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
wb_gen2_short_ptop_lt08_lag1
- id
wb_gen2_short_ptop_lt08_lag1
- family
related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
wb_mf_diff_lag0_control
- id
wb_mf_diff_lag0_control
- family
related-workbook-mf-gen2-overlay
- lag bars
0
- claim role
control_only
Interactive lab
120 observationsLoading available evidence…
Research record
Source claims, inferred rules, experiments and the evidence behind the assessment.
Source
- sha256
sha256:9a828206a7af5e90f3ecac75b2e445167e90b15cd1310024f4499c22284384af
- fetched at
2026-08-22T23:38:56Z
- title
PRO>SP500 Charts | RecessionAlert
What the source claims
Gen-1 trough/top six-factor families with Diffusion>=2 and/or top-3 average>=90% cues.
Gen-2 dice tabs with on-row horizons 6/17/34/68 and 60/80/90 thresholds; sibling pctmodel uses 7/17/34/72.
ST-ALGO Ver 1.30 lag 3-5 avg~4, latch=1, dynamic stop replacing 2.6%; Gen-2 probabilities are not actionable trading signals.
DEM++, closed-form probability map, ST-ALGO stop formula, and on-row asset SHA256 are absent.
Close-only zig-zag, empirical rank probabilities, % stops, SPY/IEF overlays, and related WeeklyData MF/GEN-2 lagged columns.
Rules actually disclosed
Gen-1 trough/top six-factor families with Diffusion>=2 and/or top-3 average>=90% cues.
Gen-2 dice tabs with on-row horizons 6/17/34/68 and 60/80/90 thresholds; sibling pctmodel uses 7/17/34/72.
ST-ALGO Ver 1.30 lag 3-5 avg~4, latch=1, dynamic stop replacing 2.6%; Gen-2 probabilities are not actionable trading signals.
DEM++, closed-form probability map, ST-ALGO stop formula, and on-row asset SHA256 are absent.
What had to be inferred
Close-only zig-zag, empirical rank probabilities, % stops, SPY/IEF overlays, and related WeeklyData MF/GEN-2 lagged columns.
Research questions
Can the pinned PRO>SP500 Charts snapshot yield any causally timed insight when DEM++, probability maps, ST-ALGO stop formulas, and on-row OHLC SHA256 are absent?
Data
- page sha256
sha256:9a828206a7af5e90f3ecac75b2e445167e90b15cd1310024f4499c22284384af
- workbook sha256
sha256:fc2be5f1fc2a2e38949ae566f6e8cb4699a95562975a498fb5a53510cc40d67c
- database
data/market.sqlite + data/recessionalert.sqlite read-only
Baseline implementation
- id
g1_trough_diff2_lag1
- family
gen1-trough-diffusion-top3-proxy
- lag bars
1
- claim role
causal_primary
- metrics
- n months
255
- cagr
0.02068745268072436
- vol
0.11234067508443882
- sharpe
0.23884078837581374
- max drawdown
-0.39847661065211815
- risk off events
978
- risk on share
0.19140625
- start
2005-05-31
- end
2026-07-31
What to try interactively
- name
lag_bars
- values
1
2
3
4
5
- name
x_horizon
- values
6
7
17
34
68
72
- name
threshold
- values
0.6
0.8
0.9
Suggested next research
Would on-row OHLC asset SHA256 change close-only zig-zag conclusions?
Can DEM++ be reconstructed from public sequential setup counts without inventing proprietary parameters?
Does resolving 6/68 vs 7/72 horizon ambiguity materially change overlays?
Trial ledger
- iteration
1
- n trials
29
What worked
Related workbook Gen-2 DIR overlays and longer-horizon close zig-zag were the stronger causal exploratory overlays in-sample.
What did not work
Gen-1 trough diffusion overlays were sparse/low Sharpe; 2022 regime destroyed x=68 overlay equity.
Agent assessment
Disposition exploratory_tested_proxy under Other/Research.
Explicit NO-GO for playable Other/Indicators native Gen-1/Gen-2/ST-ALGO promotion.
Regime behavior
- gfc
- n months
21
- cagr
0.044160559831250445
- sharpe
0.4032029039584029
- max drawdown
-0.09221172897955521
- vol
0.12622778509315408
- covid
- n months
13
- cagr
0.1792505868233727
- sharpe
1.04915822080694
- max drawdown
-0.06144374529869623
- vol
0.1709213050942567
- inflation 2022
- n months
12
- cagr
-0.17895096740923633
- sharpe
-1.8583856029404784
- max drawdown
-0.1508185676813053
- vol
0.10261396627144913
- recent
- n months
43
- cagr
0.14118778941037347
- sharpe
1.2842801323604935
- max drawdown
-0.08098002236037583
- vol
0.1078004878496749
State-space exploration
29 labeled variants across 9 families; negatives retained.
Next questions
Would on-row OHLC asset SHA256 change close-only zig-zag conclusions?
Can DEM++ be reconstructed from public sequential setup counts without inventing proprietary parameters?
Does resolving 6/68 vs 7/72 horizon ambiguity materially change overlays?
Review status
published. Research publication does not imply official admission.
Return to pending research